Cancer-PRSweb GSE


  • Home
  • Search Phecode
  • Method
  • Contact
  • News
  • PRS Overview
PRSweb Skip to content…
UKB PRS for Malignant neoplasm of kidney, except pelvis(189.11) based on GWAS Catalog (2019-05-03)
GWAS reference: 22544364;28598434 GWAS source: GWAS Catalog (2019-05-03) PRS method: P&T
PRSweb LD reference: MGI GWAS phenotype: Renal cell carcinoma;Wilms tumor PRSweb date: 2020-06-20
GWAS ID: GWAS_Catalog_r2019-05-03_X189.11 GWAS URL: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas Genome build: GRCh37/hg19
PRS tuning parameter: P<=5e-08 PRS evaluation in: UKB
  • Graph
  • Table
Loading...

Figure 1: PheWAS results P-values correspond to associations between the polygenic risk score (PRS) and the electronic health record-derived phenotype obtained using Firth’s logistic regression and also adjusting for age, gender, genotyping array, and the first four genotype principal components.

Loading...

Figure 2: Exclusion PheWAS results Results from a PheWAS performed using only subjects who never had the primary cancer diagnosis. The results are obtained as in Figure 1 but using the reduced dataset.More Info scroll down

Loading...

Figure 3: Associations between PRS and Selected Phenotype
This figure shows results for the selected phenotype in Figure 1.

Download weights of GRCh37
Download PRS Phewas
Download PRS Phewas Exclusion

LEGENDS

Figure 1: PheWAS results
P-values correspond to associations between the polygenic risk score (PRS) and the electronic health record-derived phenotype obtained using Firth’s logistic regression and also adjusting for age, gender, genotyping array, and the first four genotype principal components.
Upward (downward)-pointing triangles indicate a positive (negative) association.
Additional details are available by hovering the cursor over a particular triangle and by clicking the triangle. The horizontal dashed line indicates phenome-wide significance. Results are color-coded by disease category.

Figure 2: Exclusion PheWAS results
Results from a PheWAS performed using only subjects who never had the primary cancer diagnosis. The results are obtained as in Figure 1 but using the reduced dataset.

Figure 3: Associations between PRS and Selected Phenotype
This figure shows results for the selected phenotype in Figure 1.
This figure shows results for the selected phenotype in Figure 1. This figure provides the beta estimate for the adjusted association between the PRS and the selected phenotype from Firth-corrected logistic regression. The corresponding confidence intervals are also shown. Results from PRS PheWAS (blue) and Exclusion PRS PheWAS (red) are presented for models using either a continuous or a categorical version of the PRS. Q1 through Q4 represent the four quartiles of the PRS.

Loading…